Offending at Internet Speed
We awoke to a headline in the Times of India, “YouTube Angers I&B with Gandhi Video.” With Danish cartoons causing such agitation just about a year ago, our attention was pulled to read further.
th YouTube and two Indian networks for airing a video by a 29 year old New York-based comedian Gautham Prasad. The video, called “Time to Get Sexy,” is a lame, one man act. With a scull cover, dark round glasses and fake nose to look like Mahatma Gandhi, Prasad is pole dancing, garbed in a cotton thong and dangling pasties. Indian government officials stated the video was an “assault on the dignity of the Father of the Nation.” The apology demanded from the Indian TV stations by the government I&B minister was quick and unqualified. YouTube was another matter. There within lies the new dilemma in our wired, global community.
YouTube is sensitive to such issues. To access the video, YouTube requires one to login with their YouTube credentials and acknowledgment that they will be exposed to material that the YouTube community considers objectionable. The I&B minister threatened to block access to the YouTube website. The video is still available to the global community to amuse or offend.
Offensive “art” is not new. In the early 1500’s, Michelangelo tussled with
In the late 1980’s, Andres Serrano’s infamous Piss Christ, a photograph of a crucifix submerged in his urine, provoked wide ire in the
Through the centuries, fig-leaf painting, threats to suspend funding, legal intimidation, press room closings, transmitter lockouts and website blocking were tools of the offended. With ubiquitous Internet access, expanding WiFi networks and more versatile mobile phones information, both comforting and offensive, everything will be increasingly available.
Is access to so much information a bad thing? Maybe a murky understanding of our universal right to have access to information and our lagging ability to absorb so much data should be our greater concerns.
How many chanting Muslim zealots in February 2006 brandishing banners threatening murder and beheading of Westerners actually saw the obscene and immoral Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad? As offensive as they may have been to our Islamic brethren, the cartoons unearthed unsettling contradictions in the use of Holy Scriptures about sending fellow global citizens to their eternal rest by bomb-laden “martyrs.” Without the continuous challenge of conflicting ideas, the skills to consume, judge and absorb new information condemns one to yesterday’s news.
With more than two centuries governed by a Bill of Rights that protects “the freedom of speech,” Americans have acquired some skill in juggling competing ideas. There is no protected right to cry “Fire!” in a crowded theater, but a freedom to speak one’s mind has provided a healthy, if at times uncomfortable, tension in the exchange of ideas. Comedian Stephen Colbert openly roasting (some would say ridiculing) our president, who sat less than 10 feet away, is an exercise of that freedom.
Labels: Offending at Internet Speed
1 Comments:
Through the examples of "offensive art" you've pointed out, yet another parallelism between Gandhi and Jesus Christ has been brought out. I rejoice at these parallelisms. These "Only Two Christians Ever Born" get portrayed in myriad ways, but whether they have yet been explained adequately remains a moot question? Will all these "ubiquitous Internet access, expanding WiFi networks and more versatile mobile phones" help?
Jayakumar
Post a Comment
<< Home